![]() Some eschew modules they would ordinarily reach for, others embrace them, bringing to light wheels perhaps invented years ago that happen to exactly solve the problem in front of them today. Others chose to apply themselves to the logic of the underlying puzzle and making it work in the most elegant way they can. Some team members focus on carefully crafted complete applications that thoroughly vet input data and handle every use case they can think up. What we end up with is a situation where each participant is producing something in the manner they find the most interesting or satisfying. As Perl is such a wonderfully expressive language, this provides quite a bit of fodder to the core idea of TMTOWTDI, producing a gamut of wonderfully varied techniques and solutions.Įven the tasks themselves are often open to a certain amount of discretionary interpretation. So there’s no determination to find the fastest, or the shortest, or even, in some abstract way, the best way to go about things, although I’m certain the individuals have their own aspirations and personal drives. About that – I think of it more as an honorarium periodically awarded to acknowledge the efforts we make towards this strange goal. ![]() One thing is clear: it’s not a competition, and there are no judges, even if there is a “prize” of sorts. I suppose any answers to that would be as wide ranging and varied as the people who choose to join the team. ![]() Welcome to the Perl review for Week 126 of the Weekly Challenge! Here we will take the time to discuss the submissions offered by the team, factor out the common methodologies that came up in those solutions, and highlight some of the unique approaches and unusual code created. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |